The Shame of Ireland

The Shame of Ireland

Ireland's Human Rights Record under Scrutiny in October 2011 - Have YOUR Say

Human Rights Commission

 

Ireland has committed itself to promoting and protecting human rights. The Irish Government must report on a regular basis to the United Nations (UN) on the extent to which it is meeting these obligations. In October 2011, Ireland will be examined by the UN under the Universal Periodic Review (UPR). Under this new and innovative review process:

* Ireland will report on its record on all human rights - civil, political, economic, social and cultural.
* The UN Human Rights Council external link examines that record and recommends steps to strengthen human rights on the ground in Ireland.

Who can have their say?

The UPR process allows the possibility for everyone to give their input on Ireland's human rights record, through contributing to reports which will be prepared by the IHRC and civil society organisations or non-governmental organisations.  Three reports will be used by the United Nations in the Review:

* State Report prepared by the Government
* Report prepared by the UN itself
* Report compiling the views of 'stakeholders', external link including the National Human Rights Institution (the IHRC), and Civil Society Organisations.

How the IHRC can help you have your say?

The IHRC, as Ireland's National Human Rights Institution, will submit its own report for this process in March 2011. To inform our report, the IHRC is seeking contributions from the Irish Public and its other stakeholders. The Consultation Process will take place from 1 October to 17 December 2010.  The IHRC can support you to take part in the process:

Civil Society Organisations: we can provide you with information about the process and how your organisation can prepare a report to send to the UN. Even if you are not preparing a report, we would like to hear about the human rights issues that concern you. This input will inform our own report.

Members of the Public: we are inviting you to have your say. Please check back for more details closer to the 1st of October. Statutory Bodies: we are happy to provide any advice or assistance possible to colleagues in other independent statutory bodies who may wish to provide information for this process.

 

What is the Universal Periodic Review?

The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) is a unique process which involves a review of the human rights records of all 192 UN Member States once every four years. The UPR is a State-driven process, under the auspices of the United Nations (UN) Human Rights Council, which provides the opportunity for each State to declare what actions they have taken to improve the human rights situations in their countries and to fulfil their human rights obligations. As one of the main features of the Council, the UPR is designed to ensure equal treatment for every country when their human rights situations are assessed. (UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights)


Why is the UPR important?

The UPR Process is unique in that it is a peer-review of the human rights record of a State, by other States. The Government has to provide a report to the Human Rights Council, which, along with the Reports of independent stakeholders, will be used to examine Ireland on its human rights record. A series of recommendations will then be made to Ireland, which the Government will have to indicate its agreement with or rejection of before its peers.
Who conducts the review?

The Review is conducted by the UPR Working Group which consists of the 47 Member countries of the Human Rights Council. However all UN Member States can take part in the discussion/dialogue with the reviewed state


How is it conducted?

UPR is conducted on the basis of three inputs; a national report prepared by the state under review (limited to 20 pages), material prepared on the basis of official UN inputs (limited to 10 pages) and additional material from all relevant stakeholders (limited 10 pages). States are encouraged to consult widely in their preparations for UPR including with their National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs).

 

What difference will it make?

The Review aims to improve the situation of human rights in every country and improve people's lives. By assessing the human rights situation in each country, the UPR aims to support and expand the promotion and protection of human rights. It will offer assistance to countries to overcome specific human rights challenges.


What is the significance of the IHRC's role as a National Human Rights Institution?

National Human Rights Institutions (NHRI) are independent statutory bodies established on the basis of the UN 'Paris Principles' to monitor countries' compliance with their international human rights commitments. One of the key roles of NHRIs is to engage with the UN when their country's human rights record is under scrutiny. Their role is to provide independent, considered and balanced reports on the human rights challenges and developments in their country. The engagement of NHRIs with the UPR is considered as key to its success as a rigorous process. There is considerable weight given to the report of the NHRI which will be compiled as part of a 'stakeholders' report and provided to all Member States during their consideration of the State's record. The NHRI also has the opportunity to hold side events and meetings during the hearing of the State Report and to meet with the actors involved.


What is the role of Civil Society and Non-Governmental Organisations?

The UPR ensures the participation of all relevant stakeholders. NGOs can submit information that can be included in a report that will be compiled by the Human Rights Council called the Other Stakeholders Report.

Submissions from individual civil society organisations should not be longer than five pages, to which a more detailed and factual report maybe attached (the page limit for submissions is 10 pages when submitted by large coalitions of stakeholders ).

NGOs which have consultative status with the United National Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) can be accredited to take part in the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review as observers.

 

Ireland Human Rights Commission LINK

Views: 46

Comment by Rob Northall on December 28, 2010 at 13:38

It would appear from the above that the deadline for consultation with the Ireland Human Rights Commission has passed, as of December 17th 2010.

 

The issues that we want to raise are historical issues (unless I am mistaken; which I can be??) Any ideas on the Way Forward with this??

Comment by saenie morrison on December 28, 2010 at 14:38

Hi Robert,

It looks like this is a new innovative review process so methinks that the first review will be Oct.2011 and that is too distance a review as far as I am concerned. Under the circumstances the issues should be fast forwarded regarding our abuse in the 40s in my case, another year ? maybe I won't be here to hear.

Seanie.

Comment by pauline jackson on December 28, 2010 at 19:49
seanie do your best to hang on we need you .
Comment by saenie morrison on December 29, 2010 at 3:43

Hello Pauline,

Just for that lovely comment, I will hang on,

Thanks Pauline.

Comment by Rob Northall on March 25, 2011 at 11:15

27/05/2010
Amnesty Criticism Over Missing Children
Amnesty International has described the Government's failure to disclose details of children missing under state care as "frightening".

Amnesty International Ireland Executive Director Colm O’Gorman criticised Ireland's human rights record amid claims that 200 children have died while under State care in the ten years.

Mr O'Gorman went on to criticise the Government over its delays in bringing forward a referendum on children’s rights and a long-delayed report on the Irish arms trade.

“Governments, including our own, cannot hold themselves above the law. They cannot decide that human rights and international law apply only to their political opponents but never to themselves," Mr O'Gorman said.

According to Amnesty International, a total of 419 children disappeared from care between the end of 2000 and June 2009 and vulnerable children are being placed in adult mental health units.

”Irish governments have a very long tradition of big promises on human rights and no follow through,” said the Amnesty Chief.

He added: “We have ratified the International Convention on the Rights of the Child. Yet hundreds of children have disappeared, others are placed in unsuitable mental health units and, despite all-party agreement, there is no date for a children’s rights referendum.

"The government has introduced legislation to monitor the Irish arms trade but it has failed in 2008 and failed again in 2009, to publish the reports the law requires.”

In the Dáil today the Labour Leader Eamon Gilmore TD added to the pressure asking the Taoiseach for answers on the deaths of children in care.

Mr Gilmore asked why the Government was still not in a position to say how many children died in the care of the State over the last 10 years and told the House that it was one thing to say the files cannot be handed over for legal reasons but quite a different thing that the numbers of deaths are not known.

The Labour leader went on to question the Taoiseach about the legal difficulties regarding sending files to the inquiry team in relation to the cases.

 

Source - http://www.build.ie/national_news.asp?newsid=112065
Comment by Rob Northall on June 18, 2011 at 12:48

This article is about rebuilding Irelands International Reputation

 

http://thehiberniatimes.com/2011/06/02/marketing-ireland-riverdance...

 

 

Bellow is a Comment I Posted on this article

 

Mr Kenny is worried about “how to restore Ireland’s image abroad” why did the “Justice For Magdalenes” Committee have to involve the UN Committee Against Torture in order to get any response from his and previous Governments for an inquiry.

 

Why wasn’t the recommendation last year by the Irish Human Rights Commission enough to provoke an inquiry?

 

Why was the Gagging Order which is breach of Human Rights allowed to pass in Law in the Redress Act 2002?

 

Why is the Current Government “railroading” a Statutory Trust Fund into Law when quite clearly Survivors of the Industrial School System  and the Groups that claim to represent them clearly oppose this?

 

I for one haven’t received a reply to a letter I wrote to Mr Kenny with reference to these issues?

 

When I submitted a petition signed by 341 people who wanted the Statutory Fund STOPPED and drew attention to another Petition in Support of this with a further 372 signatures’! I was fobbed of with a dismissive email from Rauri Quinn.

 

Irelands Human Right Record comes under scrutiny this October in front of the United Nations I would suggest that the Taoiseach focus on these issues to rebuild Irelands International Reputation.

 

I hope that the Justice For Magdalenes receive better Treatment than the Survivors of the Industrial School System?

 

Comment by Rob Northall on October 16, 2011 at 16:53
Comment by micheal on May 29, 2016 at 13:08

These are things that still need to addressed, i know the ihrec.ie closed the public consultations in 2015, so what we are supposed to be seeing know is a human rights commission, well informed and with teeth, lets put that to the test. Michael

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of The Shame of Ireland to add comments!

Join The Shame of Ireland

About

Rob Northall created this Ning Network.

CLICK TO FOLLOW SHAME OF IRELAND ON TWITTER

This is a Private Site

Membership is drawn from Survivors of the Irish Industrial School System their Family and Friends. Survivors of the Magdalene Laundries their Families and Friends are welcome too!

Others can follow on Twitter by Clicking the Button Bellow

Follow ShameOfIreland on Twitter

 Follow on FACE BOOK by Clicking <HERE>

Please Like this FACE BOOK Page?

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Badge

Loading…

© 2019   Created by Rob Northall.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service