OBJECTION TO THE FIFTY FIFTY DEAL it was not agreed by survivors of abuse but by individuals

The Right of place has stated that this 50 50 deal was agreed already before redress, OK, BY WHO, WHEN, WHY WHERE, and HOW ?

BEHIND CLOSED DOORS AS I AS A SURVIVOR HAD NEVER HEARD OF SUH RUBBISH AND THIS WAS MY RIGHT NOT THE SUPPORT GROUPS WHO MAY HAVE AGREED ON THIS NONSENSE I WOULD HAVE DISAGREED OUT RIGHTLY. THE GOVERNMENT DECLARED THEY WERE 100% GUILTY AS THE CHURCH. THAT IS 100 100 DEAL TO SURVIVORS THE DAMAGED GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS WE SHOULD TAKE ALL THIS TO THE COURTS OF HUMAN RIGHTS. DODGEY DEALS WERE MADE AND UNQUALIFIED, UNEDUCATED, UNEXPERIENCED PEOPLE CONVINCED SURVIVORS OR RULES RATHER THAN THEIR RIGHTS

I WAS GIVEN RULES BEFORE REDRESS BY THE RIGHT OF PLACE NOT A SAY NOR MY RIGHTS. IF YOU AGREE WE MUST MAKE THIS KNOWN.

WE WERE ALL LED BY RULES NOT RIGHTS AS SURVIVORS BY THESE SO CALLED GROUPS.